1. Forums
2. FAQ
3. Which one is better to make a deal with?

Which one is better to make a deal with?

Author: QuentinDan, Created: 2019-05-22 23:24:22, Updated:

---

---

• OKEX V3 API changes and host upgrades
• js simulated correctly, real-time computation wrong
• Highstock is limited?
• Is it possible to change the color of the interface of the inventor's web page display?
• How to buy strategies
• Is it possible to test the futures of Bitcoin with the help of a simulated retest strategy?
• Limitations of the backtesting engine
• How to install ta-lib on linux docker?
• How does the Ma language leverage on the Bitmex perpetual contract?
• The double coordinate curve
• Can you add this function?
• Do you have this markup function in Mandarin?
• When can I add a matcha exchange?
• What could be the reason for the last bad system call when installing a Linux host on your phone through the terminal simulator?
• Can you adjust the amount of depth that GetDepth returns?
• How to deploy a robot to local, win or mac
• A mistake was made when adding a token futures exchange.
• Can the administrator provide the wss connection code for Deribit?
• BitMax uses aggregate
• Ask how the visualization program records the highest price

---

dsaidasiBitmex has the lowest transaction fees and the fewest pins. But it requires good wall-breaking software. The token contract transaction fees are lower than ok, and the needle is smaller than ok, but the depth is worse.

Inventors quantify - small dreamsThere are several contracts currently supported by FMZ, which can be found in the API documentation, starting with section 1.1.