Simply put, why is it not feasible to move OKEX's assets through a contractual hedging strategy?
Author: Cousins, Created: 2020-10-28 13:18:22, Updated: 2023-09-26 20:55:47
Recently, the OKEX coin has become a game currency, and many older people are considering the possibility of transferring the game coin to avoid losing and making a profit by hedging the contract.
I'm going to answer this question with two points.
First, the assumption is that there are two exchanges a and b. The assumption of this strategy is that after a certain number of transactions, it is possible to steadily reduce the assets of exchange a and increase the assets of exchange b.
The assumption can be simplified as, there must be two exchanges to achieve a decrease in the assets of one exchange and an increase in the other.
Then there is a loophole in this assumption. That is, if such a strategy exists, then it is possible for exchange a not to actually trade and only to trade exchange b. That is, exchange a is not required to trade.
A exchange is not mandatory and contradicts the assumption.
The logical proof is that it is not possible, and then we will talk about why the strategy is not practical.
Many of you may have seen similar news, where a user's account was stolen, a hacker bypassed login verification, or a trojan used to get some information from a user, but due to problems such as two-step verification, the transaction was lost to the hacker.
At this time, it is common to choose small coins with very low depths to be struck, because this means that a pair is essentially offered by one account with a high price that is difficult to negotiate, and another account to buy. Then, a low price that is difficult to negotiate is offered, another account is sold, and the pair is struck. In essence, the b account eats the excellent depth provided by a account loss. That is, a account loss is marketed to b to bring a profit.
That is, such a strategy must be in the same market, and it must be guaranteed that account b can eat the depth provided by account a in order to profit. Two different exchanges clearly do not have this possibility.
I'm not going to do it.
Conversely, if you can figure out the pricing formula for an OKEX contract, say an OKEX contract is the price of a token.0.5 + the price of the yuanIf the price of the stock is 0.5, then you can manipulate the price of OKEX by raising the price pressure with big money.
But there is also a problem that the profit is on the okex.
- Futures counter-hand doubled algorithm strategy commentary details
- Thinking about moving assets through a contract hedging strategy
The Law of NatureI would like to add that there is another way to do this, which is the bullish trend, where the multi-headed market is empty OK, the empty headed market is more OK. This method of controlling the good position can allow the OK funds to be transferred.
High suction low throwIs it possible to be a live horse doctor? Use the funds from OKEX as a hedge fund. For example, to make a profit or a market in the Binance currency. But the currency is risky, so it is possible to consider hedging with OKEX and the Binance currency.
The grassNow okx USDT is 7-8 off, but the price is still consistent with other exchanges, providing low cost for price manipulation, and there may be room
The grassThe idea is basically the same as yours, that it is not good to guarantee that OK losses can only be made by means like Martin.
The grassI'm not sure if it's a good idea to sell it at a 7.5 discount, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea to sell it at a discount, especially if you're talking about tokens and binan.
Miracle at the Re-Storage..do the opposite okayx make money what...
CousinsYes, but now OK, other exchanges have cancelled OK in many pricing formulas. OK, although there are other exchanges in the pricing formula, but this profit is equivalent to OK eating only. You must guarantee a profit of more than 30%, otherwise the withdrawal will also be a loss. It's hard to do. It's honest and it's worth it.